This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lakomski, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Values and Decision Making in Educational Administration

The argument for the primacy of subjective values in educational administration is increasingly gaining prominence. Of concern is the argument's central claim that attention to subjective values can overcome the perceived irrelevance of scientific administration and organization theory and help us make better decisions. There are at least two reasons why the "case for values" does not succeed. First, the conception of subjective values presented as a viable alternative is identical with that of positivists such as Weber and Simon. Second, the notion of noncognitive and subjective values itself is incoherent and does not allow for judgment between values. If we are interested in making better decisions, then we are ill-advised to embrace subjective values that are devoid of empirical content, but attend to the positivist assumptions that shore up the distinction between "values "and "science" in educational administration.

Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 3, 70-82 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X87023003005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Kowalski Need to Address Evidence-Based Practice in Educational Administration Educational Administration Quarterly, August 1, 2009; 45(3): 351 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. M. Allix Transformational Leadership: Democratic or Despotic? Educational Management Administration Leadership, January 1, 2000; 28(1): 7 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Riehl The Principal's Role in Creating Inclusive Schools for Diverse Students: A Review of Normative, Empirical, and Critical Literature on the Practice of Educational Administration Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2000; 70(1): 55 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Berkhout and W. Wielemans Toward Understanding Education Policy: An Integrative Approach Educational Policy, July 1, 1999; 13(3): 402 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. T. Begley Cognitive Perspectives on Values in Administration: A Quest for Coherence and Relevance Educational Administration Quarterly, August 1, 1996; 32(3): 403 - 426. [Abstract]

				P. Gronn and P. Ribbins The Salvation of Educational Administration: Better Science or Alternatives to Science? Educational Management Administration Leadership, January 1, 1993; 21(3): 161 - 169. [PDF]