Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Administration Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, V. M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Problem-Based Methodology and Administrative Practice

Viviane M. J. Robinson

A much neglected reason for the limited contribution of educational research to the improvement of practice is the mismatch between our various research methodologies and the generic features of practice. After a conceptual analysis of practice as problem solutions, a postpositivist methodology (Problem-Based Methodology) is outlined that incorporates a theory of problems and problem solving and a set of normative criteria for judging solution adequacy. The application of PBM to inquiry into administrative practice is illustrated in two school-based case studies of the design and implementation of schemes for the collective assessment of children's learning. The case analyses are discussed in terms of the preservation of the practical context and the capacity of PBM to produce generalizable knowledge.

Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 3, 427-451 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X96032003007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
S. B. Wepner, A. D'Onofrio, and S. C. Wilhite
The Leadership Dimensions of Education Deans
Journal of Teacher Education, April 1, 2008; 59(2): 153 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
R. Donmoyer
Paradigm Talk (and Its Absence) in the Second Edition of the Handbook of Research on Educational Administration
Educational Administration Quarterly, October 1, 1999; 35(4): 614 - 641.
[PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
G. L. Anderson and J. Grinberg
Educational Administration as a Disciplinary Practice: Appropriating Foucault's View of Power, Discourse, and Method
Educational Administration Quarterly, August 1, 1998; 34(3): 329 - 353.
[Abstract]