Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Administration Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rusch, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gender and Race in Leadership Preparation: A Constrained Discourse

Edith A. Rusch

Rowan University

The professoriate is a powerful and privileged position. As faculty design leadership programs and plan courses, discourse about gender and race is often limited or treated as a taboo subject. The power and privilege to avoid equity discourse in preparation programs leads to similar avoidance in school communities where practitioners report fear and limited knowledge and skills to confront gender and race issues. This article examines faculty perceptions of discourse about gender and race in educational leadership programs, departments, and classrooms. The author employs critical and feminist perspectives related to power, privilege, and fault lines to discuss faculty fear and a lack of openness to learning about gender and race issues. The author concludes that to understand the praxis of creating equal opportunity in diverse school communities, educational leadership faculty must move beyond program rhetoric and experience the complex and challenging practices of learning how to enact equity.

Key Words: equity discourse and leadership preparation • power and privilege politics • fault lines • research and democratic praxis

Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 1, 14-46 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X03259110


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LeadershipHome page
J. Lumby
Leaders' Orientations to Diversity: Two Cases from Education
Leadership, November 1, 2009; 5(4): 423 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Education, Citizenship and Social JusticeHome page
A. Taysum and H. Gunter
A critical approach to researching social justice and school leadership in England
Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, July 1, 2008; 3(2): 183 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
E. Murakami-Ramalho, J. Piert, and M. Militello
The Wanderer, the Chameleon, and the Warrior: Experiences of Doctoral Students of Color Developing a Research Identity in Educational Administration
Qualitative Inquiry, July 1, 2008; 14(5): 806 - 834.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Management Administration LeadershipHome page
J. Lumby
Conceptualizing Diversity and Leadership: Evidence from 10 Cases
Educational Management Administration Leadership, April 1, 2006; 34(2): 151 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
W. H. Sherman
Preserving the Status Quo or Renegotiating Leadership: Women's Experiences With a District-Based Aspiring Leaders Program
Educational Administration Quarterly, December 1, 2005; 41(5): 707 - 740.
[Abstract] [PDF]