| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Leading Coherent Professional Development: A Comparison of Three DistrictsCenter for Educational Policy Analysis, Rutgers University
Center of Educational Policy Analysis at Rutgers University
Ph.D. Educational Policy Program, Center of Educational Policy Analysis at Rutgers University
Center for Educational Policy Analysis at Rutgers Graduate School A comparison of three urban school systems suggests that district offices can influence teaching through professional development. District leaders can structure their programs to provide coherent and content-focused professional development. The district orientation (vision, emphasis on professional development, use of human resources) set by the dominant coalition of leadersincluding but not limited to the superintendentin each district influenced the coherence and content focus of the professional development programs. District differences in their organizational capacity affected coordination and planning of professional development. The district with the most coherent focus on helping teachers develop deeper knowledge about select subject areas had the greatest teacher-reported influence on teaching practice.
Key Words: district leadership professional development superintendents district capacity district organization
Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 3,
413-448 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

