This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McGhee, M. W. Articles by Lew, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Leadership and Writing: How Principals' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Interventions Affect Writing Instruction in Elementary and Secondary Schools

Texas State University, San Marcos

Chulsub Lew

Texas State University, San Marcos, chulsub{at}gmail.com

Purpose: This study explored the perceptions of teachers regarding principal support for and understanding of effective writing instruction and whether certain areas of knowledge influence principals' actions and interventions.

Research Design: Researchers surveyed teacher participants using the Principal's Support for Writing Instrument and also asked whether their principal was trained in writing as a process. The sample (N = 169) included elementary and secondary rural, urban, and suburban teachers.

Findings: An exploratory principle-axis factor analysis with a promax rotation was conducted to determine the underlying structure of the 13 survey items. Results of the factor analysis yielded a two-factor correlated solution. The first factor accounted for 55.79% of the variance and the second for 6.94%. The two-factor correlated structure was confirmed using structural equation modeling. Most fit statistics were observed to be good. Using the subscales as observed variables, a path analysis was conducted using the theoretical latent variables generated in the confirmatory factor analysis to explore the potential causal relationship. The effect of Belief on Intervention was .72. Knowledge explained approximately 57% of the variance of Intervention.

Conclusions: There is clear indication that principals who have strong knowledge of and belief in effective writing practices act in ways that help teachers do their best work. Those high in knowledge and belief were likewise high in quality actions and interventions. These results hold promise for school leaders and those shaping preservice and professional development opportunities for current and future practitioners.

Key Words: leadership • writing instruction • principal knowledge • principal actions • teachers' perceptions

Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 3, 358-380 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X06297202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?