This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rorrer, A. K. Articles by Scheurich, J. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Districts as Institutional Actors in Educational Reform

Department of Educational Leadership and Policy of the Utah Education Policy Center at the University of Utah

Linda Skrla

Texas A&M University

James Joseph Scheurich

Departmejnt of Educational Administration and Human Resource Development at Texas A&M University

Purpose: Intermittent attention to the district as the unit of study has left a void in our understanding of the complexities associated with the ability of district-level leaders to contribute to successful, systemic educational reform. In this article, the authors address this void by providing a narrative synthesis of previous findings, proposing a theory of districts as institutional actors in systemic reform with the goal being to increase achievement and advance equity, and suggesting areas of future research that extend our understanding of districts as institutional actors in educational reform and build our knowledge of reform that improves achievement and advances equity.

Proposed Conceptual Argument: The four roles of districts evident in research to date are (a) providing instructional leadership, (b) reorienting the organization, (c) establishing policy coherence, and (d) maintaining an equity focus. These four roles, which are interdependent, variably coupled, and coevolving through a nonlinear process, serve as a foundation for the authors' proposed framework of districts as institutional actors in improving achievement and advancing equity.

Implications for Research and Practice: The discontinuous and limited nature of previous research has contributed to the lack of theoretical advancement with regard to a research-based understanding of district reform and thus to a lack of research-based guidance for district leaders to follow to create systemically districts that improve achievement and advance educational equity for all children. The framework presented here contributes toward the resolution of these issues by developing an intentional, coherent, and integrated framework of districts as institutional actors in reform.

Key Words: district reform • systemic reform • institutional actors • improving achievement • educational equity

Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 3, 307-357 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X08318962


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Mangin Literacy Coach Role Implementation: How District Context Influences Reform Efforts Educational Administration Quarterly, December 1, 2009; 45(5): 759 - 792. [Abstract] [PDF]