This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0013161X08321221v1 44/4/529    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Leithwood, K. Articles by Mascall, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Collective Leadership Effects on Student Achievement

¹ Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto
² Ontario Institute for the Studies of Education, University of Toronto

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kleithwood{at}oise.utoronto.ca.

	Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to estimate the impact of collective, or shared, leadership on key teacher variables and on student achievement. As well, it inquired about the relative contribution of different sources of such leadership and whether differences among patterns of collective leadership were related to differences in student achievement.

Methods: Evidence included 2,570 teacher responses from 90 elementary and secondary schools in which four or more teachers completed usable surveys. Student achievement data in language and math averaged over 3 years were acquired through school Web sites. Data were analyzed using path-analytictechniques.

Findings: Collective leadership explained a significant proportion of variation in student achievement across schools. Higher-achieving schools awarded leadership influence to all school members and other stakeholders to a greater degree than that of lower-achieving schools. These differences were most significant in relation to the leadership exercised by school teams, parents, and students. Principals were awarded the highest levels of influence in schools at all levels of achievement.

Implications: Influence seems to be an infinite resource in schools. The more those in formal leadership roles give it away, the more they acquire.

First published on August 13, 2008, doi:10.1177/0013161X08321221

Educational Administration Quarterly 2008;44:529.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?