This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0013161X07309744v1 44/1/3    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Christman, D. Articles by McClellan, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

"Living on Barbed Wire": Resilient Women Administrators in Educational Leadership Programs

Department of Educational Management and Development, New Mexico State University, MSC 3N, Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001; e-mail: danachri{at}nmsu.edu

Rhonda McClellan

Background: Despite access for women administrators in educational leadership departments, the longevity of their service within them is tenuous. Women administrators are caught in the social constructions of gender and leadership.

Purpose: To explore how some women administrators in educational leadership programs have sustained their administrative roles; to evaluate whether their resiliency rests on a feminine type of leadership.

Participants: A group of seven diverse women administrators in educational leadership programs who were peer nominated, are accomplished scholars, and have an average of 11.25 years of experience.

Research Design: A computer-based qualitative Delphi technique using an online asynchronous mode and ensuring anonymity.

Data Collection and Analysis: Several iterations focused on the identification of resiliency markers and components, descriptions of episodes denoting the participants' overcoming difficult situations, proposals for adapting educational leadership programs to foster better women leaders, and the reflection and interpretation of data.

Findings: The participants' rankings and narratives indicate that gender identity and leadership are more complex than to simply fit them into one gender construction model or another. When interacting in particular episodes, resilient women leaders embrace or disclaim one gender norm for another to varying degrees. A multidimensional-gendered leadership model is provided.

Conclusions: Faculty and students should not expect the socially constructed norms in women leaders. These resilient participants suggest that gendered leadership norms are too simplistic and that women leaders must be willing to shift into multidimensional gender and traverse conventional borders.

Key Words: women leaders • multidimensional-gendered leadership • complexity • Delphi technique • resiliency • administration

This version was published on February 1, 2008

Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 1, 3-29 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X07309744


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?